Over 59607

Reilly Politics


sell out -

TAGS: o reilly sellout politics media bias
Rating: 4.33/5

More politifakes by ChadAllen

AnimeIsGoodForYou - December 24, 2013, 1:31 pm
Here is the funny thing, anyone who quotes that verse is judging. Also Phil stated an opinion after asked a question he did not judge.

I WONDER - Who paid for breakfast.

TOLERANCE - As long as you agree with everything I say

Fox News -

TAGS: go o reilly
Rating: 3.33/5

More politifakes by Zeitguy

Calling X-mas a Republican Holiday makes about as much sense as saying Santa Claus is... -

TAGS: santa claus o reilly culture war
Rating: 3/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

fauxnews - June 7, 2014, 7:51 pm
Hey, what a friends for, right? ;-) Seriously, though, thanks for the compliment and for being a good sport. For me, it's always fun and games. Have a great weekend, mate. Cheers! :-D
foxrecon19d - June 7, 2014, 4:16 pm
Faux, thanks for repeating the Democrat Party narrative, but doing it in a bat **** funny way. Having said that, I hope I offended the hell out of you. Lol!
OTC - June 7, 2014, 9:09 am
Its democrats who make that claim which is why they attack Christmas every year, must be that christian element they don't like
fauxnews - June 7, 2014, 7:54 am
haha...That stung a little. X-D You can make fun of my mum BUT DON'T CALL ME VIK! /kidding. Seriously, though, don't worry, I have my little bit of fun, get it out of my system, then go dormant. ;-) Thanx for swinging by. Take care, mate.
foxrecon19d - June 7, 2014, 1:57 am
More like, bring on the massive Democrat Party narrative distractions! This is an election year, after all
PeteofSanJose - June 7, 2014, 1:44 am
I see that good ole' Vic has been reincarnated as FakeNews! Bring on the wanton massive postings!
foxrecon19d - June 7, 2014, 1:42 am
Republicans say Christmas is THEIR holiday- Democrat Party narrative, anyone?

O'REILLY SAYS ROMNEY LOST FINAL DEBATE - Disappointed O’Reilly Slams Mitt : "Romney Didn’t Do Anything, Nothing." (When Fox News says a GOP candidate lost...you know you are in trouble!)

CONSERVATIVES - "See, I'm right, and you're wrong-- because I love America, and you're just a a filthy Liberal who hates America."

O'Reilly said what?!?? -

Denial -

Bill O'Reilly: -

sell-out -

Roy Moore is no match for the King -

Fox News Outrageous Hypocrisy -

Now in come the Trumptards with their excuse . . . -

Fox News Hypocritical Crybabies -

Even Bill agrees -

So STFU Republiklans -

TAGS: nancy reagan funeral obamacare o reilly
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

fauxnews - March 11, 2016, 7:31 am
Who cares? If traditionally ALL Presidents skip these things (and they do) then it doesn't matter WHAT they choose to do. You'd rather them sit at home and pick their nose? Fake controversy by fake conservatives.
Olympusmanager - March 10, 2016, 9:45 pm
I'll bet that not a one of them skipped a funeral to attend a rock concert.

Bill O'Reilly: Choke Artist -

Bill O'Reilly in the No-Friend Zone -

Alert: Nations Now Capable Of Using Online Photo Meme Makers To Launch Missiles anywhere -

TAGS: batman robin o reilly science deniers
Rating: 4.48/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

rebeccaolsen - May 30, 2015, 2:49 pm
BUMP http://i.imgur.com/IIqQu.gif

Holy Sh*t Batman! -

TAGS: republican o reilly independent voter fox
Rating: 4.45/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

fauxnews - May 30, 2015, 3:28 pm
rebeccaolsen - May 30, 2015, 3:28 pm
I know. But thank you. I will shave off a few 'cigarette-jokes-at-your-expense' for #76636 :)
fauxnews - May 30, 2015, 3:26 pm
lolololololol REBECCA FTW ;-)
rebeccaolsen - May 30, 2015, 3:24 pm
P.S. you said,#76501"I do believe, however, that some on this site have the IQ of a dead tree in the middle of a desert. Those are the people I avoid." Guess you concede I'm one of the smart folks since you didn't "avoid" me. #76630,#76632,#76633 #OWNED
rebeccaolsen - May 30, 2015, 3:20 pm
Aren't you supposed to are "ignoring" me, hun? (#76501) Oh, that's right. I pushed your bu.ttons, so you can't :) FYI it's not "a lesson in humility" when it comes from an insecure hypocrite. You make it too easy. YOURINSECURITY FTL
MMessEnnBeeCee - May 30, 2015, 3:20 pm
You are welcome. Now back to our regularly scheduled program.
MMessEnnBeeCee - May 30, 2015, 3:19 pm
offset to your comment. My comments were offset from cybehagen's,not yours. Please try to understand how the universe works before you go off to lala land
MMessEnnBeeCee - May 30, 2015, 3:17 pm
I'm going to break from my dead tree thing for a minute to give you a lesson in humility. When someone starts a comment with someone's name, that comment is addressed to that person, not you. If it had been addressed to you, the comment would have been
rebeccaolsen - May 30, 2015, 3:11 pm
fauxnews - May 30, 2015, 3:08 pm
Shush Becca. Never interrupt your opponent when he is making a mistake, especially when that mistake is an epic temper tantrum :eating popcorn,enjoying the show:
rebeccaolsen - May 30, 2015, 2:31 pm
FYI aren't you supposed to are "ignoring" me, hun? (#76501) Using Faux or Cyberhagen to passive aggressive respond to the things I say really doesn't fit the definition. YOURb***ON FTW :)
rebeccaolsen - May 30, 2015, 2:30 pm
...and, oh yeah, the simple fact that this conversation pushed his bu.ttons SO MUCH then he felt the need to self-consciously respond to it. PWNed
rebeccaolsen - May 30, 2015, 2:30 pm
MMessEnnBeeCee is a far-right conservative. We can safely infer this when he trashes on "liberals" the way he does, the content of his poster which are always right-leaning, never left, and his CC denial script which is from rightwing propaganda...
MMessEnnBeeCee - May 30, 2015, 2:25 pm
then you must be a republican. Logic and liberals obviously don't go together very well.
MMessEnnBeeCee - May 30, 2015, 2:24 pm
Cyberhagen, you are correct. If you notice, faux (like he always does) takes comments out of context. I never claimed to be an independent, I never claimed to be a republican, yet these libs always claim "if you don't agree with everything I say,..."
rebeccaolsen - May 30, 2015, 12:57 pm
I have no problem standing behind my liberal beliefs. I vote democrat in most elections. At least those evil liberals can stand by their views. Deniers like O'Reilly hope the means will justify the ends. They are just sellout phony fools.
rebeccaolsen - May 30, 2015, 12:56 pm
ie. An independent voter or liberal wouldn't be caught dead using Coulter in argument "against liberals." It is not about broad paint strokes, hun, it is about political junkies selling themselves out to win an argument at all costs.
rebeccaolsen - May 30, 2015, 12:54 pm
The part of faux's poster that says, "It's not often a Republican pretends to be an independent voter but when they do, I know they lost a debate with a liberal" should've tipped you off to that. MMessEnnBeeCee, for instance, quotes Ann Coulter.
rebeccaolsen - May 30, 2015, 12:51 pm
Some conservatives like O'Reilly pretend to be independent when they clearly are not because they are scared that they political views will be used against them as an accusation of bias, and undercut their effectiveness as a debater.
Cyberhagen - May 30, 2015, 12:47 pm
So then, what? In your estimation, a "true" Independent is actually liberal? It just sounds like anyone who disagrees with you on any topic is therefore a republican and can be painted with a mighty broad brush.

Rightwing Fruitcakes -

TAGS: o reilly angry
Rating: 4.35/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

guest818 - May 29, 2015, 5:31 am
you rest your case?fantasies? *facepalm* You should consider putting some sand in your @$$.That way,whenever someone asks you why you try to cover up the truth with the dumb things you say, we can just tell them that you like keeping your head in the sand
MMessEnnBeeCee - May 28, 2015, 8:45 pm
or at the very least not embarrass yourself by broadcasting that you fantasize about me. I'm positive that you aren't my type.
MMessEnnBeeCee - May 28, 2015, 8:43 pm
I rest my case. You can cease the fantasies about me now.
guest818 - May 28, 2015, 8:41 pm
but this poster pushed your b***ons. otherwise, you wouldn't have responded angrily to it. in fact you wouldn't have responded to it at all if it didn't bother you on some level. i would put that in the win column, or your lose column. take your pick 5Ls
MMessEnnBeeCee - May 28, 2015, 8:09 pm
Nothing over inflates your ego like falsely stating that you've won every debate on this site and that you've pushed everyone's but.tons. lolololololololol - you are one funny dude.

Megyn Kelly -

Bill O' Reilly: Killing the Constitution -

Bloviating Gasbag -

Bill O'Reilly Anchored In Stupidity -

Fox News: Out Of Touch With Conservatives -

Master and Apprentice -

Bill O'Lielly -

As Brian Williams -

Bill O'Lielly -

and the doofus award goes to... -

TAGS: bill o reilly lies war zone
Rating: 2.09/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

calron - February 28, 2015, 10:25 pm
Wow, yet another falsehood that someone has s******ed because it validates what people want to believe.
Zeitguy - February 26, 2015, 12:50 am
The steeper the pyramid the more impending the collapse. Couldn't happen to a better guy

P i n o c c h i o -

TAGS: bill o reilly liar war zone
Rating: 1.92/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

fauxnews - February 24, 2015, 1:00 pm
HA! X-D Love it.
Zeitguy - February 23, 2015, 10:53 pm
Brian Williams reads the news with embellishment, Bill O'Reilly embellishes the news based on his views.

Bill O'Lielly -

TAGS: bill o reilly lies wartime falklands
Rating: 1.71/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

DebtToAmerica - March 20, 2015, 1:33 am
i would have gone with Bill O'RLY

Bill O'Lielly -

TAGS: bill o reilly falklands brian williams
Rating: 1.67/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

fauxnews - March 25, 2015, 8:30 pm
Better them than letting O'Lielly be his own fact checker. And lie (often) he does. X-P
Oldsod - March 25, 2015, 8:22 pm
...and Mother Jones sets the standard?

Bill O'Lielly -

TAGS: bill o reilly lies falkland brian williams
Rating: 1.67/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

calron - March 29, 2015, 2:40 pm
Actually the footage of the protests and the other coverage does show that it was a warzone, but thanks for detailing again how you know what his is thinking and then insulting me as backup.
rebeccaolsen - March 29, 2015, 2:33 pm
You're an O'Reilly apologist. O'Reilly should've made himself more clear in his reporting,he appears like he was trying to brag about being a brave reporter back in the day.He's not new to this.He already knows the rules.So do u,though you pretend not too
rebeccaolsen - March 29, 2015, 2:27 pm
You're being contrarian.Rather never corroborates O'Reilly's claim about bullets sh** into the crowd.The issue was not whether O’Reilly had reported on a violent protest,but whether O’Reilly had reported from a war zone.Rather doesn't come close to this
calron - March 29, 2015, 1:39 pm
And of course you ignore that Rather's account of the situation there proves one of the witness wrong on their own account and them says that proof that one of the accusers is wrong as irreverent, which is the main thing I'm saying.
calron - March 29, 2015, 1:37 pm
So your saying that do to lack of evidence that you must be right, Argument from Ignorance, ignore that warzone covers combat and ignores the combat, and ignores proof that NASA got there claim wrong actually exists, and then ridicule once again.
rebeccaolsen - March 29, 2015, 5:05 am
You say you have a civic duty to be skeptical of NASA scientists but not a controversial pundit like O’Reilly? Im doing laundry. Could you hold onto it for me? You’re stuck in a spin cycle anyways - it’s not like it is doing you any good in this debate :)
rebeccaolsen - March 29, 2015, 5:05 am
If there was a group of people sh** by real bullets, and O'Reilly says he was witness to it (as well as his crew)that would have been a big headline and we would've seen it in the news hun.Rather never backs that.Rather never saw O’Reilly there.Irrelevant
rebeccaolsen - March 29, 2015, 5:05 am
O’Reilly says soldiers fired into the crowd with "real bullets" and slaughtered "many" civilians. Media reports from the time make no mention of troops firing real bullets.
rebeccaolsen - March 29, 2015, 5:04 am
The issue was not whether O’Reilly had reported on a violent protest, but whether O’Reilly had reported from a war zone. Dan Rathernot never corroborates whether O’Reilly was there.He never lends “credence" to the idea that this was - derp - a warzone
calron - March 28, 2015, 6:10 pm
So you still choosing to ignore the video and Rather's statements, ignore the witness's job was to oversee the Falklands coverage, and failed to address my actual arguments. That is not demolishing anything.
rebeccaolsen - March 28, 2015, 4:55 pm
Haven't done this in awhile. Demolishing your arguments was fun. WE have to do this again :)
rebeccaolsen - March 28, 2015, 4:52 pm
Until O'Liesalot can account for the serious discrepancies in his Falkland reporting, he has lots of 'splainin' to do Lucy. Not the public's duty to give him the benefit of the doubt and do his spinning for him. Mmmmkkk? Back to the grind.
rebeccaolsen - March 28, 2015, 4:49 pm
The facts don't remotely match up to what O'Reilly is saying. His evidence to counter this is a witness who wasn't even there to witness this. This isn't enough to change the fact that Bill's account doesn't match up to the facts.
calron - March 28, 2015, 4:24 pm
No, you are ignoring the facts by trying to claim that they are merely interpretation. There is also what Rather said that provides contradiction to one of Bill's accusers.
rebeccaolsen - March 28, 2015, 4:20 pm
very narcissistic of you. ignoring your INTERPRETATION of the vid. O'Reilly shoulda made that more clear in his reporting,he appears like he was trying to brag about his brave-in-the-field days as a reporter.He's not new to this,he already knows the rules
calron - March 28, 2015, 4:15 pm
And ignoring the video evidence and accusing me of spinning. But thanks for denying your attacks in the very same post you launch yet another attack.
rebeccaolsen - March 28, 2015, 4:10 pm
attacking O'Reilly's poor attempt at spin hun. persecution complex is right. And I don't often agree with anything Ronald Reagan ever had to say
calron - March 28, 2015, 4:05 pm
Cause your attacks make that video evidence disappear.
rebeccaolsen - March 28, 2015, 4:00 pm
the Factor. Browne hasn't dared to vet his story with anyone outside of Bill's show.O'Reilly is too biased to trust him with his own fact checking,duh.It's just Foxnews spinning, like you hun.
rebeccaolsen - March 28, 2015, 3:58 pm
This is derpy too. His source Don Browne wasn't even there to witness any of this.Don oversaw the footage many miles away. His opinion means about as much as Brian Williams. If he really wants to get O'Reilly's back, he should go onto a show other than
calron - March 28, 2015, 1:28 pm
Yep, never mind the video that disproves at least part of his accusers' stories, just go into the Ad Hominem routine.
fauxnews - March 24, 2015, 11:07 am
*yawn* So what? "Stolen Valor” O'Reilly brought his pal onto HIS SHOW "The Factor" to back him up.Gee...letting O’Reilly and his show be his own fact checker isn’t a conflict of interest.What’s next?Letting criminals be their own parole board? X-p
calron - March 21, 2015, 11:35 pm

Bill O'Lielly -

TAGS: bill o reilly lies nuns el salvador
Rating: 1.67/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

rebeccaolsen - April 4, 2015, 1:36 pm
So, today class, we learn from Calron that it's not an "ad hominem" attack if Calron does it. When it comes to fallacies, you are doing it wrong :) PWN
rebeccaolsen - April 4, 2015, 1:34 pm
Oh, so it is okay for you to say "there is a witch hunt" and label a blanket "ad hominem attack" against the media? Scientifically speaking, that would require definitive proof of a conspiracy. But I think you are just venting, denier.
calron - April 4, 2015, 1:21 pm
And of course, http://www.politico.com/blogs/media/2015/02/media-matters-all-hands-on-deck-for-bill-oreilly-203178.html Basically there is w witch hunt in progress because of differing political beliefs.
calron - April 4, 2015, 1:19 pm
Actually I do not share the same political beliefs as Bill, but thanks for the a**umption. The truth is I do not know which why he meant it and the claim that he lied requires that it is not reasonable to interpreted in a innocent manner.
DebtToAmerica - March 30, 2015, 7:35 am
partisanship has gone too far when you get to the point where you defend a liar simply because he claims to have the same political beliefs as you. as a journalist he's supposed to inform the people and yet he lies, and you willingly defend him.
rebeccaolsen - March 29, 2015, 2:40 pm
The truth FTW. :) Next time you want to go hunting again, give me ring. I love shooting fish in a barrel.
rebeccaolsen - March 29, 2015, 2:38 pm
I beat all you Fox News reporters. I saw Jesus go to heaven. That was the same day I got stamps at the Vatican City Post office.
rebeccaolsen - March 29, 2015, 2:37 pm
I just became a grizzled war zone reporter by spending 20 minutes on Reddit. Quick, someone hire me!
calron - March 29, 2015, 2:37 pm
Your Appeal to Ridicule is noted.
rebeccaolsen - March 29, 2015, 2:37 pm
Hey, cool, I saw the Hindenburg disaster and Washington crossing the Delaware. I'm available for press inquires.
rebeccaolsen - March 29, 2015, 2:36 pm
I was a grizzled civil war reporter - because I saw a Ken Stone documentary. I was also a reporter on the moon with Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin during the Apollo 11 mission. I saw ph**os of it.
rebeccaolsen - March 29, 2015, 2:35 pm
Guess that makes me a combat veteran of WW I, II, Korea and Vietnam - because I've seen the ph**ographs
rebeccaolsen - March 29, 2015, 2:34 pm
I saw Kennedy being sh** because I watched the Zapruder film.
calron - March 29, 2015, 1:49 pm
He could have easily meant that she couldn't process that someone would shoot nuns in the back of the head, as it fits within the context of what he was talking about.
calron - March 29, 2015, 1:24 pm
Thanks for going though all the effort in detailing how you know what he as thinking.
rebeccaolsen - March 29, 2015, 5:14 am
You’re bad at this, aren’t you hun? Whatever you do, please don’t stop on my account. It’s very entertaining. PWNing you is fun. :)
rebeccaolsen - March 29, 2015, 5:13 am
Im sure Bill's ma could PROCESS the time her son "saw pictures."LMFAO What he obviously meant was:'his mom couldnt process the horror of him WITNESSING with his own two eyes THE TIME HE SAW nuns sh**.’ I cant process Bill’s account either.It’s a dumb lie
rebeccaolsen - March 29, 2015, 5:12 am
But you're trying to convince me that it is "reasonable" to believe what Bill really meant to say was:"When I would tell her, hey, mom, I was in El Salvador and I SAW PICTURES OF nuns get sh** in the back of the head, she almost couldn't process it.”LMFAO
rebeccaolsen - March 29, 2015, 5:10 am
Here is O'Reilly's actual quote, hun:"When I would tell her, hey, mom, I was in El Salvador and I saw nuns get sh** in the back of the head, she almost couldn't process it," O'Reilly said. "She couldn't process it, you know."
calron - March 28, 2015, 6:12 pm
No need to pretend anything, rather I went by reasonable interpretation of the few times he did this. Rather the side that claims "lie" pretends to know exactly what he meant and what he saw. I'm just using a higher standard that rank speculation.
rebeccaolsen - March 28, 2015, 4:45 pm
So now you are pretending to know what O'Reilly was thinking.lol He has a history with his ahem sloppy reporting. Blaming the context works the first few times. Now he has a pattern. By now he should know better.Sounds like you should you too
calron - March 28, 2015, 4:21 pm
No, neither comes off as bragging when veiwed in the context of the conversation that the references where in and referenced something in a manner that is not outside common use.
rebeccaolsen - March 28, 2015, 4:14 pm
O'Reilly should have made that more clear in his reporting, he appears like he was trying to brag about his hardcore in-the-field days as a reporter and the horrors he was brave enough to witness. He's not a new reporter, he already know the rules.So do u
calron - March 28, 2015, 4:09 pm
Nope, you dropped the context in order to make the charge of bragging. Even with that change the comment doesn't mean what you say it does. Any then you go into attacks on people that do not agree with your misrepresentation as if that makes you right.
rebeccaolsen - March 28, 2015, 4:04 pm
No one is buying it, not even Billyboy. just blind foxnews supporters. dizzy yet?
rebeccaolsen - March 28, 2015, 4:03 pm
watched both videos hun. First Billyboy brags about being there, "I've seen nuns sh** in the back of the head, ok?" Not the first time he's bragged about his adventures. Then when finally confronted by his bs, he says he was simply shown ph**ographs of it
calron - March 28, 2015, 3:59 pm
If you go to fauxnews's source, and actually listen to what he said directly, you'll see that your interpretation here doesn't fit with how it was said at all. I'd say is likely you got your info second had instead of listening to what he actually said.
rebeccaolsen - March 28, 2015, 3:44 pm
Where do you see that? That's a buncha derp.He's underfire for needing to clarify his remarks and moving the goal posts. O'Reilly wouldn't brag about seeing "internet ph**ographs".He brags like he was actually there for bravado's sake. Spin much?
calron - March 28, 2015, 1:26 pm
Og I see, you're going to a**ume whatever interpretation that fits your narrative is the right one, regardless of if another is plausible and then go into the Ad Hominem routine.
fauxnews - March 24, 2015, 11:10 am
But dont worry,just go to your fav rightwing news source Breibart.Im sure you'll find some rightwing tabloid that will find an excuse for ole'Billbo.The politics section is usually buried behind the Bigfoot articles and the global warming hoax section ;-)
fauxnews - March 24, 2015, 11:07 am
Well...here’s VIDEO of O'RLy lying,“When I was in El Salvador I saw nuns get sh** in the back of the head” http://www.mediaite.com/tv/oreilly-apparently-contradicted-himself-on-witnessing-nun-killings-fox-responds/ Clearly he meant, he actually “saw” it.
calron - March 21, 2015, 11:37 pm